The Guardian covered the research in “Americans Care Deeply about ‘Global Warming’ — but Not ‘Climate Change’.”. When a study informs deeper journalistic inquiry, however, the results can be revelatory. //--> on 13 Aug, 2019, This content belongs to the Conducting Research Stage. However, in the past several years it has seen renewed focus with the rise of blogs such as Vox, 538, Wonkblog and The Upshot, and mainstream media shows signs of covering research with greater frequency and closer focus than in the past. It is the duty of the editor to convey all the reviewers' comments to the author. You will perform the deliberate repetition of previous research procedures in your clinical setting and thus will be able to strengthen the evidence of previous research finding, and correct limitations, and thus overall results may be in favor of the results of previous study or you may find completely different results. “Anthropogenic Emissions of Methane in the United States” It is therefore possible in field settings to repeat or replicate a research on large scale and more than once too. The team of researchers has all expertise in the subject area and also has the access to adequate information related to original study to be able to design and execute a replication. Replication Study. Follow simple guidelines to end up with the best one and impress professors. Researchers from Harvard and five other institutions sought to better understand the regions and sectors that are the key sources for methane emissions caused by human activity. You don't need our permission to copy the article; just include a link/reference back to this page. The author shouldn’t shy away from pointing out the shortcomings of previous works. Announce your research topic. The National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM) Foundation. How should I assess scientific literature to prepare myself for writing a paper? “The Low-wage Recovery: Industries and Jobs after the Great Recession” Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Live panel discussion: Maintaining trust in peer review during COVID-19. You have to read journal articles, editorials, magazines, survey reports, etc. Be sure to tell readers whether or not your original hypothesis held up after examination. A well-written literature review should provide a critical appraisal of previous studies related to the current research area rather than a simple summary of prior works. The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted. In high school you might have written three- or five-paragraph essays, and it’s okay to use those same patterns for a college research paper, but be sure that whatever format you choose makes sense for your paper. The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). They also had the choice of doing a straight write-up or using the study as part of a larger story, pulling in additional research or adding their own material. In field conditions, more opportunities are available to researchers that are not open to investigations in laboratory settings. A young researcher's guide to writing a literature review, COURSE: How to conduct a literature search and review, A young researcher's guide to digital tools for literature search and reference management, How to write the literature review of your research paper, Tips for new authors on responding to peer reviewers, Do's and don'ts for responding to peer reviewers' comments. The Washington Post wrote about the study’s results in “Two New Studies Underscore Hopes, Frustrations of Revamped School Lunches.”, “Prevention of HIV Infection with Early Antiretroviral Therapy” Climate Report Authors Answer 11 Basic Questions,”, “U.S. • Add 2-3 paragraphs that discuss previous work. [CDATA[// >